RulingsSAFLII
Botha v Smuts and Another (CCT 40/22) [2024] ZACC 22; 2024 (12) BCLR 1477 (CC); 2025 (1) SA 581 (CC) (9 October 2024)
Published Wednesday, 9 October 2024
AI Editorial Summary
Constitutional Court judgment in Botha v Smuts addresses legal principles that may have implications for information rights and access to justice frameworks. While not directly about the Information Regulator, the ruling could influence interpretation of constitutional rights relevant to POPIA and PAIA enforcement contexts.
Botha v Smuts and Another (CCT 40/22) [2024] ZACC 22; 2024 (12) BCLR 1477 (CC); 2025 (1) SA 581 (CC) (9 October 2024) SAFLII
Continue reading at SAFLIIRead original
Related coverage
RulingsMonday, 2 November 2026
Kgetlengrivier Concerned Citizens v Kgetlengrivier Local Municipality and Another (361/2025) [2026] ZASCA 148 (2 November 2026)
RulingsMonday, 2 November 2026
Mukansi N.O and Others v Nedbank and Others (2019/25860) [2026] ZAGPJHC 1245 (2 November 2026)
RulingsFriday, 30 October 2026
National Director of Public Prosecutions v Agrizzi (077715/2024) [2026] ZAGPPHC 1243 (29 October 2026)
RulingsThursday, 10 September 2026